Monotheism In Interfaith Exchange – 18

WE CONTINUE HERE with what the Muslim needs to know for understanding the formation  of Christian “canon“—as it relates to the story of shaping Christian “orthodoxy.”

Pages numbers in this article refer to the Rubenstein book, When Jesus Became God, The Struggle to Define Christianity during the Last Days of Rome.

Authentic and Pseudo Writings, Connections, and Gaps

From a Muslim point of view, the four Gospel books of the New Testament (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) are at best aHadith-like records of Prophet Jesus—not revealed words of God.  They are not a Christian equivalent to the Quran, which is a revealed text. Similarly, the Acts of the Apostles forefront ahadith-like remembrances of events involving certain principal “Disciples” of Jesus—Peter, James and John—with other figures, notably Paul, occupying its later pages.

The documents approved by Church synod had been judged to be of  genuine Apostolic provenance and thus were approved to be included in Christian Scripture. The Gospel of Matthew claimed to be linked to the authority of the Disciple of Jesus, Matthew, the “Tax Collector”;  the Gospel of Mark links with the chief Disciple, Peter, through his “interpreter” Mark, according to the writings of Papias, quoted by the 4th century Church historian Eusebius.

The Gospel of John may or may not have originated from John, “the brother of James, son of Zebedee,” who was one of the Twelve Disciples: Scholarship has named several others as possible “John” candidates for authorship.  The Gospel of Luke—noticeably similar to the Gospel of Matthew in its stock of narrative incidents and its wordings—is not connectable to any Disciple known by the name “Luke“; the only identified person named Luke is one addressed in Paul’s letters as their “doctor,” travel companion, and co-worker  (Colossians 4:14, 2 Timothy 4:11, Philemon 1:24).

In addition to those four accepted “Gospel” works, there were numerous other “gospels,” “acts,” “letters” purported to originate with the Apostles—and even further letters supposed to come from Paul—that the Church declined to include, judging them spurious.  Some of those bogus texts are still available to scholars today—such as the fragment of the Gnostic “Gospel of Peter,” to name only one. While such writings falsely claim the authority of genuine Apostles, still they are of value to us in reflecting the various, competing philosophies of the day.

The only New Testament book actually claiming to be a writing (or “scroll“) revealed from God (actually, it claims to be revealed by “Jesus Christ” to “John”!) is the last one, the Revelation to John, a visionary picture of persecution and assurance of the final victory of “Christ,” the sacrificial “Lamb of God“—in accord with Paul’s theology.  Other apocalyptic books of visionary revelation existed at the time, but those, too, were excluded from the New Testament canon.

Writing Paul’s Christ into the Jesus Story

We see that the Church went through several centuries during which she debated just which of the available documents were to constitute the complete Christian scripture. Whether Paul is to be credited with single-handedly authoring the “Gospel of Jesus Christ,” which he prolifically expounds in a significant segment of the New Testament pages, perhaps only Allah now knows.

On the other hand, we do have abundant historical evidence—though not referred to by name in Paul’s work—of various metaphysical groups sporting a heavenly “Christ”-type figure, one come to “save” hapless humans from “the present evil age,” groups populated most notably by “Gnostics” –a cover-term for numerous groups of multiple stripes– and still poorly understood by scholars.

Bible, Paul’s Letter to the Galatians 1:4  …in order to set us free from this present evil age, Christ gave himself for our sins, in obedience to the will of our God and Father.

Bible, Paul’s Letter to the Ephesians 1:19-21;   6:12    This power working within us is the same as the mighty strength which he used when he raised Christ from death and seated him at his right side in the heavenly world.  Christ rules there above all heavenly rulers, authorities, powers, and lords; he has a title superior to all titles of authority in this world and in the next.

… For we are not fighting against human beings but against the wicked spiritual forces in the heavenly world, the rulers, authorities, and cosmic powers of this dark age.

There is a content gap between the 1st century of Prophet Jesus together with his Apostles fanning out from Jerusalem to the Jewish Diaspora, on the one hand, and Emperor Constantine with his 4th century official adoption of Pauline Christianity as the State Church, on the other hand.  Except for some selective events in the first chapters of  the Acts of the Apostles, the Twelve Disciples—the designated transmitters of Jesus’ message—are “missing in action” from the rest of our records. That void is filled with the writings of the “Church Fathers” and Eusebius’ Church History.  Unsurprisingly, these heroes of Christian faith and martyrdom held fast to Pauline interpretation, clinching the case—in the mind of the unsophisticated public—that they represented the teaching of Jesus.

Most depressing of all is the lack of complete manuscript copies of Gospel texts dateable before the fourth century—although there are hundreds of earlier small fragments of various parts of the New Testament—and the paucity of transmission details regarding the four Gospel works.

How Did It All Play Out?

Our brief excursus finished, we are ready to return to Rubenstein’s novelesque retelling of the 4th century Arian versus Anti-Arian controversy, which continues for another hundred pages with the exploits of the two parties contending for orthodoxy.  Criminal activity and accusations thereof, unscrupulous tricks and strong-armed bullying at Church Councils, condemnations and excommunications from Church membership, appeals to the Emperor to reverse Church decisions, trumped-up charges, insults, hostage holding, blackmail—all were part of the colorful, on-going political intrigue. (Rubenstein, pp. 119-134)

This was the background in which the Church forged Christian doctrine on the anvil of philosophical controversy.

This story, inshâ’Allah, continues in Part 19…

 

Written By

Growing up Christian, Dr. Linda Thayer came to realize in her teens, that Jesus as 'divinity' and Jesus as the second 'person' of a 'Godhead' (the doctrine of the 'Trinity') were philosophical constructs, evolved later and not part of the New Testament Gospel books' portrait of the Son of Mary. In her 30's, when working as Bible translations consultant and linguistic advisor in West Africa, she had already added all things Islamic to her reading list, along with Biblical Studies. She has three university degrees in linguistic science (BA, MA, PhD), with a minor in anthropology. She believes that her fellow Muslims need to be current with the thinking and findings of modern Biblical Studies in order to meet Christians halfway in understanding the prophetic mission and personal nature of Jesus. To this end, she writes of the historical phenomenon of the Jesus movement from an interfaith perspective that dovetails with the Quran and ahâdîth.

"You are invited to respond to the contents of the article and to engage in conversation about the issues raised."

Leave a Reply